Communicating sustainability: truthfulness, reputation and defensible claims
Communicating sustainability today means stating precisely what you have done, within what scope and with what evidence. Permitted labels, AGCM risks and a method for building claims that hold up.

To communicate sustainability without risk you need to state precisely what you have done, within what scope, with what data and who verified it. From 27 September 2026 vague claims and self-made labels are prohibited, but caution does not mean staying silent: it means building specific messages and keeping the evidence. Here you will find the labels you can use, how the AGCM (the Italian Competition Authority) works and a five-step method for claims that stand up in front of customers, competitors and authorities.
Why truthfulness has become a reputation issue
For years environmental communication was treated as marketing: positive words, green colours, a few leaves in the logo. Today an environmental claim is a statement with legal and, above all, reputational consequences. A public challenge weighs more than the fine: a social media crisis, customers asking for explanations, competitors filing complaints, banks and investors revising their assessment.
The risk applies even when the company has genuinely invested in sustainability. A real result told badly, for example extended to the whole company when it concerns a single plant, becomes greenwashing just like an invented one. Conversely, a precise message, even a modest one, builds trust over time.
The underlying rule is simple: caution does not mean saying less, but saying it precisely. Those who disappear from the debate out of fear, so-called greenhushing, miss the opportunity to get credit for what they have actually done.
What makes a claim defensible
Authorities assess the overall impression the message creates in the consumer, not just the words: images, symbols, colours, omissions and placement all count. A claim holds up when it answers five questions.
| Question | What the claim must say | Example |
|---|---|---|
| What? | The specific environmental characteristic | Recycled plastic content, not “green product” |
| On what? | The scope: product, component, site or company | “The packaging”, not “the product” |
| How much? | A measured value, with unit and reference year | “40% of the bottle by weight, 2025 data” |
| Compared with what? | The basis of comparison, if the claim is comparative | “Compared with the version sold until 2024” |
| Who says so? | The data source and any third-party verification | Certificate from an accredited body, stated method |
The percentages in the table are examples. A percentage reduction without a base year, scope and absolute starting value says nothing, and readers know it. The same applies to climate claims: offsets no longer allow a product to be declared neutral, as explained in the article on carbon neutral and what you can claim.
Sustainability marks and labels: which ones you can use
Under the new rules, a sustainability label, i.e. a voluntary mark relating to environmental or social characteristics, is allowed only if it is based on a certification scheme or established by public authorities. The certification scheme must be open to all traders on transparent terms, have criteria developed with experts and stakeholders, provide procedures for non-compliance and include monitoring independent of the scheme owner.
In practice, the little leaf logo designed by the marketing department can no longer be used as a label. Here is where the most common tools stand:
| Tool | What it is | Use in communication |
|---|---|---|
| EU Ecolabel and Type I labels (ISO 14024) | Labels with environmental excellence criteria and third-party verification | Allowed; they also demonstrate the recognised excellence required for generic claims |
| Scheme certifications (for example on forest management) | Certification schemes with independent verification | Allowed if the scheme meets the legal requirements and the claim stays within its scope |
| Self-declared claims (ISO 14021) | Company claims, without a third-party logo | Possible if specific and documented; they must not be presented as a label |
| EPD (ISO 14025) | Environmental product declaration with verified LCA data | A solid data source; the figures must be quoted correctly, without turning them into a judgement |
| In-house or group logos | Symbols created by the company | Not allowed as a sustainability label |
For construction products and materials, the EPD remains the most robust tool: it does not say a product is “sustainable”, it provides comparable figures the customer can use.
AGCM risks and more
The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) applies the Consumer Code to communications aimed at consumers. It can open investigations, order the practice to stop, accept commitments from the company and impose fines of up to 10 million euros. In 2025 it fined the operator of Shein’s European website 1 million euros, finding the claims on circularity and recyclability untrue or confusing and the emission reduction commitments contradicted by the data.
The risk does not end with the AGCM:
- Business-to-business communication. Directive 2024/825 protects consumers, but in B2B relationships the rules on misleading advertising (Legislative Decree 145/2007) still apply, again enforced by the AGCM.
- Self-regulation. The IAP Code of Marketing Communication Self-Regulation requires declared environmental benefits to be based on truthful, relevant and scientifically verifiable data. The rulings of its Jury are quick and public.
- Competitors. A competitor can challenge a claim in court for unfair competition or report it to the authorities.
- Professional customers and banks. Anyone who receives a claim in a specification, a questionnaire or a tender compares it with the data: an inconsistency costs credibility for years.
The proposed European Green Claims Directive, which would have imposed prior verification of claims, stalled in 2025 and is not law today. Its approach, with specific claims, scientific evidence and independent verification, nonetheless remains a good model of caution. The rules already in force are summarised in the article on the new rules from 27 September.
A five-step method
The companies that communicate best do not have better copywriters: they have a process. Here is a framework that works for an SME too.
- Start from the data. First ask yourself what you can prove, then what you want to say. The message comes from the data, not the other way round.
- Open a dossier for each claim. Data source, calculation method, scope, limitations, any external verification and the claim’s expiry date.
- Get approval from several functions. Significant claims go through sustainability, marketing, legal and management. Delegating to an agency does not shift the responsibility.
- Review on a schedule. A 2023 figure does not support a claim in 2027. Set a review at least once a year, alongside the data update.
- Make the evidence accessible. A page with more detail or a QR code leading to the method and data strengthens the message instead of weakening it.
The dossier works if the data is already in order. An ESG report under the VSME standard is a good starting point, because it gathers consumption, emissions, waste and social indicators in a single document using a recognised method. With Envify you can keep every value linked to its source document, such as the utility bill or the waste form (FIR), so the evidence is already there when someone asks for it.
From vague claim to defensible claim
| Avoid | Better |
|---|---|
| “Sustainable company” | “In 2025, 100% of the electricity at the Brescia site was covered by guarantees of origin” |
| “Eco-friendly packaging” | “Cardboard packaging with 70% recycled fibre, certified by a third party” |
| “Low-impact product” | “Carbon footprint of 2.1 kg CO₂e per unit, according to a verified EPD” |
| “We are committed to the planet” | “Target: −30% Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2030 compared with 2024, with a public plan and annual verification” |
All values are examples: in your communication use only figures you can document. Note that the better versions are longer and less catchy, but they are the ones you can repeat without fear in front of a customer, a journalist or an official. That is what, over time, builds a company’s sustainability reputation.
A defensible environmental claim says what, within what scope, how much, compared with what and who verified it. Labels are allowed only if certified or public. A dossier of evidence for each claim, approved by several functions and reviewed every year, protects both compliance and reputation.


